Recent content by GeorgeCS

And making them to wear a BDSM restraint on their genitals is not one of them. That is child abuse and if you know anyone who does this you need to report to the police so they get arrested.

What the actual hell? If you know any parent (or ANYONE) who is touching underage boys in any way, shape, or form you need to report to the police and have them locked up for child abuse. Seriously, wth

I don't see the point of such question. This would be a massive violation of human rights, individual self-ownership, and could only be done by a tyrannical society. If you touch someone without explicit consent you need to rot in jail.

Even with religious conservatives pouring loads of money trying to create magical benefits for abstinence, there is no evidence whatsoever to say lack of ejaculation is better than ejaculating frequently. What we do know are the objective benefits of sexual release: pleasure, relaxation...

Slightly longer than flaccid to me. The cage itself is not what restricts the erection, it’s the attachment to your balls. The main growth during the erection is lengthwise, and the cage essentially creates a tug-of-war between the erection and the balls, and the shorter the cage the more...

Hi, I notice the sidebar can no longer be hidden, which is not an issue on PC but when looking on mobile or tablet things get really cramped. Just thought it would be good to see that option again. Thanks.

They never really go away, you just get used to them and to waking up in the middle of the night. Personally this is one of the reasons I never took chastity further than occasional lockups to spice up foreplay. Not having good and continuous 8 hours of sleep will affect my work performance...

As Harriet Ann Jacobs said, death is a preferable alternative to slavery. So at least for me being single wins every time. Now, why would anyone want even talk to someone who doesn’t treat them as an equal is beyond me. I guess each person has their standards.

Yes, the answer is yes. In fact, you didn't create anything, you just revealed what was already there but never came out. And "monster" is a mild way to describe it.

There is no problem. Don’t get me wrong, my point was simply in case you were developing tastes that were incompatible with either what your partner wants, or with how people should treat each other, because otherwise there is no reason for guilt. As I said, just go for it and keep it playful...

If this is the case then the guilt is entirely natural, and maybe a sign you are going on a wrong path. The whole domination and denial fantasy is such a turn-on for some guys precisely because it IS objectively a mistreatment that would be entirely inappropriate to inflict on someone in normal...

I don’t really get this “I want to do it but I’m also guilty by it” thing. Isn’t he the one pushing and encouraging you to do these things? Then as long as you two have good communication and expectations you shouldn’t really be conflicted. Just go for it and keep it playful! Now, if you are...

Assuming mutual consent then no, there is no problem at all. If someone agrees to do something in exchange for another, then they must be happy with the exchange. Now, the question of why would anyone value being used for non-sexual tasks is totally beyond me. Some will even pay to be used like...

If I want to be precise, in T&D only the “D” implies not reciprocating full orgasms. The teasing and edging part are vanilla in itself, and a great tool to extend pleasure that can always end with a proper finish. If they do not want a proper finish, fine, nothing to reciprocate! But if they DO...

I never used the term “affection”, any intimate act can be affectionate. I used the term reciprocity, which to me is the basis of all healthy relationships, and the very essence of T&D is not reciprocating full orgasms. No point sugarcoating what it is. Because you want to make sure you get the...