No one is going to be happy until we just have:
- blue balls and permanently locked
- fuzzy diverse older women
- I made this on my Nokia 6310, AI wrote a generic caption for me
- TL;DR & scary woman in a catsuit
Best vanilla captions ever
- Thread starter BlueGuy
- Start date
No one is going to be happy until we just have:
The arguing over the caption threads is as endless as it is funny. Really none of them do much for me me anyways. Tom posts the most believable if you will for people in long term, indefinite chastity. The rest about here cucky, your balls are so swollen etc scream male fantasy.
You are absolutely right, and maybe we can reflect on that?
This true if you are focusing on the painting (for this instance) only. Like a picture or caption.
But it is impossible to ignore that this art depicts 2000 years of (Western) civilisation, philosophy and mythology.
The painter needed to have a great knowledge to tell the story.
Ancient Greek Mythology is very violent but is an observation of the (known then) human society and a methaphoric enterprise. And also good blockbusters for that period, true.
Chastity is just a niche kink centered on our d.ck. That does not go further.
Unlike the cited painting (as an example), the weight of those AI captions is far more important than the story itself.
Hence, probably, the feeling of being uncomfortable with what appears as purely and simply torture.
New one from me, I couldn't resist 
I do a lot more of this. My chastity has turned me into a bigger romantic than I was before. I write her love letters at least once a week.No one is going to be happy until we just have:
caption threads
- blue balls and permanently locked
- fuzzy diverse older women
- I made this on my Nokia 6310, AI wrote a generic caption for me
- TL;DR & scary woman in a catsuit
View attachment 148623
Many times I feel the same way I felt when I first fell in love with my wife and partner of 46 years.
I think about her constantly. I want to do anything to please her and I'm on a constant low simmer of desire for just her touch.
Menopause has slowed intimacy down, but my chastity keeps her feeling desired, wanted. It keeps me totally engaged in her presence. She doesn't like talking about chastity, but she loves the results.
I feel I have to push back on this take
Yes it's true for most people, it's a weekend amusement, but for a minority it's clearly a strong driver of submission.
There are different takes on what captions represent (and if they should). Most are about the sensation of sexual denial, others relate this to a relationship dynamic, a matrimonial obedience tool.
I'm entirely uninterested in both of those, I see it as a psychological pressure point, an illusion of choice, an inevitable identity shift. I also find the idea that this is a male kink to be serviced by women to be a bit dull, as is the reductive happy wife/feminist take - The idea that denial could originate from agentic female intention is more appealing
You are seeing a caption as empty torture porn, I saw it as a significant moment and a psychologically painful door closing along the path of someone's submission.
It's telling a parallel story to the one Gentileschi depicted - female agency, a capacity for female violence in service of a cause, in the context of calculated manipulation - and what does trust mean here? Is it really a manipulative betrayal or was it both inevitable and necessary.
The caption points to the rebirth of that person, just as much as our own culture is moulded by events over millennia.
Both reveal something dark and uncomfortable about human nature.
You can't pretend that these things are not real physical experiences - just that other people's lives make you uncomfortable, you want to invalidate their emotional landscape and remove it from the room - but really your discomfort is still yours to process.
Complete submission and absolute female dominance is toyed with as a safe transgressive fantasy, because women are seen as operating within patriarchal social limits, that women can never truly hold absolute, irreversible power.
Yet it can also be an inevitable endpoint of chastity when the exit doors are locked, but only if someone submits to it.
If a caption makes you uncomfortable, it's really because you are reserving the power to say no
(token caption for waffling in a picture thread)
Last edited:
Your point of view is totally valid and there is absolutely no attempt from me to diminish how deep the chastity lifestyle is for some of us.I feel I have to push back on this take
Yes it's true for most people, it's a weekend amusement, but for a minority it's clearly a strong driver of submission.
There are different takes on what captions represent (and if they should). Most are about the sensation of sexual denial, others relate this to a relationship dynamic, a matrimonial obedience tool.
I'm entirely uninterested in both of those, I see it as a psychological pressure point, an illusion of choice, an inevitable identity shift. I also find the idea that this is a male kink to be serviced by women to be a bit dull, as is the reductive happy wife/feminist take - The idea that denial could originate from agentic female intention is more appealing
You are seeing a caption as empty torture porn, I saw it as a significant moment and a psychologically painful door closing along the path of someone's submission.
It's telling a parallel story to the one Gentileschi depicted - female agency, a capacity for female violence in service of a cause, in the context of calculated manipulation - and what does trust mean here? Is it really a manipulative betrayal or was it both inevitable and necessary.
The caption points to the rebirth of that person, just as much as our own culture is moulded by events over millennia.
Both reveal something dark and uncomfortable about human nature.
You can't pretend that these things are not real physical experiences - just that other people's lives make you uncomfortable, you want to invalidate their emotional landscape and remove it from the room - but really your discomfort is still yours to process.
Complete submission and absolute female dominance is toyed with as a safe transgressive fantasy, because women are seen as operating within patriarchal social limits, that women can never truly hold absolute, irreversible power.
Yet it can also be an inevitable endpoint of chastity when the exit doors are locked, but only if someone submits to it.
If a caption makes you uncomfortable, it's really because you are reserving the power to say no
(token caption for waffling in a picture thread)
View attachment 148670
What I was trying to say, in a clumsy way probably I fully agree, is that whatever we do and whoever we think we are, we aren't and will never be a Leonardo but simply some men with a brain spinning around our dick...
Chastity is fun but we are a fistful only thinking like this, and even less if we are looking from a female perspective
Having said that, let's have fun!
The mighty Joan Collins. Back before the internet was a thing and UK TV very tame and only 4 channels, I started up to watch her in The Stud at about 1am on ITV as a teenager. Sunday morning rugby was difficult.
I'm surprised nobody's spilt a Cinzano Bianco all over her.
In case you were being serious, this was the 1980s evening soap star Joan Collins, who played a character known as Alexis on Dynasty.
This shot is from a spread she did for Playboy, being one of the most "mature" stars they ever used. She def gave off domme vibes.
