PA Glans Armor

I just finished making and am testing a very lightweight prototype device that covers the glans and requires a PA to employ.

The piece is basically the very front cage portion of the Contender that I make. It's made entirely of stainless steel and uses a medium security screw to attach the PA pin to the cage.

It weighs 1-1/2 ounces, which is less than half the weight of the MouseTrap. I just put it on and will be testing it overnight to determine whether I can endure a nighttime erection. If so then I'll keep it on at least a few more days, maybe more, depending on how much I like/dislike it.

The main concern about wearing a tube-only style device is that the PA piercing carries the entire weight of the device. A heavy device can cause the user's piercing to migrate, and in the worst case, tear. Considering how light this device weighs I don't expect a single problem to occur while wearing it.

 

I just finished my second night wearing it, and it's super comfortable, even when I become erect. The "sweet spot" on the top, backside of my glans is untouchable, though if I really tried I could most likely achieve orgasm. I could have made the cage ring narrower, to create more compression when aroused, but that wasn't my goal. If I WERE going to use this device to enforce chastity though, the cage ring would definitely be narrower.

 

Yes, adding some tube is definitely a possibility. I'm not sure if you're visualizing a tube attached to the cage ring, or if you're visualizing a tube replacing the cage ring.

The more pieces required to make a device equate to more time and effort, so in the end I feel it's wiser to design devices with a minimum of parts, in order to reduce fabrication time, which affect final price. So for this piece I personally envision replacing the ring with tube, rather than adding both a ring and tube.