I was wondering if anyone else in long term chastity has prostate issues. As a kid, I was told by older guys, use it or loose it when talking abut having sex. I recently went to the urologist for my yearly checkup and when he looked at my bloodwork, he was concerned about my prostate. When she did the rectal exam and pushed my prostate, i ejaculated all over the floor. She asked when I had sex last or ejaculated, I told her I hadn't had sex for over 2 years and no ejaculation for several months. I have several tests to have done and hope they all come out well.
The 2 questions I have is do you wear your cage to the Dr.s office and unlock it in front of them or take it off before the exam and does anyone else think that no ejaculation for an extended time if harmful?
My key holder has done prostate stimulation while i am caged and it does make me leak all over but hasn't done it for a while.
Thank you for your thoughts.
Nearly all of the personal accounts, though anecdotal, do not indicate anything to worry about.
Physically, there are can be (potentially serious) issues if blood circulation is restricted in ill-fitting devices. Also, there can be serious infection concerns with open and untreated wounds, and there is an increased risk of infection with any inserted device like a catheter or (to a lesser extent) piercing.
We know, without doubt, there are physical mechanics to purge old sperm and ejaculatory fluids. These may involved a slightly increased prostate size which should only manifest in terms of slightly more frequent urination. But there is nothing to indicated that "build ups" cause a problem, or in fact, even exist.
What dramatically impacts fertility and sexual performance are abnormal hormone levels. Chastity not only doesn't have negative impacts to these hormones, but may actually show (slight) benefit.
Now, where does this thinking tend to come from? Well, there are a type of scientific study called epidemiological studies that use observational data to form correlative conclusions. Additionally, studies that rely on self-reporting also can be flawed. Studies on male ejaculation tend to involve both... If I may sumerize the main issue with them:
It is true that some of these studies show men who ejaculate infrequently are generally in poorer health. HOWEVER, they do not distinguish men who CAN OTHERWISE ejaculate often, but voluntarily don't from those men who CAN'T PHYSICALLY cum often.
Most men ejaculate as much as they can. So these studies are making a big and non applicable assumption! Ask yourself, if every man is having as many Os as they can, who is in poorer health? The ones who cum frequently or the ones who can't? That's what those studies suggest.
If you want to stay healthy in this regard, I would be more concerned about your emotional state, diet, and exercise routines than I would about how often you voluntarily choose to deny yourself an O.
