So, there is new size of HT, named The Nub. The lenght of cage is 25mm (0.98 inch), so it is 10mm less than Nano... What do you think about it? Isn't it to small? Is there there is any volunteer here who would like to try it?
Wow, that really is tiny! I'd have thought that there would be a fairly small (no pun intended) market for something like that.
Holy Trainer is notoriously funny about how they measure their lengths. They go from the base ring to the tip of the cage, which doesn't give the whole story. Based on referencing their photo and making my best estimate of how much is on each side of the lock, I would guess that the insertable length is probably in the 35-40mm range, which still isn't a whole lot! There will definitely be people who want this though! I'd volunteer to try it, but their diameters are barely big enough for me to squeeze into in the standard size, and no chance on the nano or nub size
I would try it - the nano size was too big for me as when well rested, my guy didn’t go to the end. I am currently wearing a cheap china 40mm metal cage and it works great. The nub could be great for me.
I don't know why the manufacturers cannot figure this out. The correct way to measure a trapped ball device is assembled, from the back of the rear ring to the inside tip of the tube.
Sign me up! I'll fit. I need something for airport security and travel, but sadly I will have to wait for the knockoff to come out before I can try it. I will eventually buy the real thing, both in steel and in metal-detector friendly versions, but the OEM devices are simply too expensive to experiment with. I was planning to order a Nano-knockoff this weekend, but now I may have to wait. Unless, or course, Holy Trainer is looking to issue free devices in exchange for reviews and feedback?
Omg!! I would LOVE to be a well.."beta" Beta tester for the Nub!! Or anything they put out really!! I am willing to build a blog around it 100%
I still have yet to try out the nano! I may just leap to the future dhgate knockoffs and try both of em
Any one try it yet? Looks like it has some side “wings” on the tube compared to its larger versions. Need a plastic device for travel but can’t dish 100 for the tube before someone tries it. Afraid escape would be much much much to easy.
That looks so foreign to me, and borderline "cute", but ultra short is a good look on some! I saw a red one posted on Reddit last week that was on an uncut person, so there was just the little red nub, with no indication of anything behind it..
I'm not judging, but I find the quest to find the tiniest chastity device kind of odd. At this rate I wouldn't be surprised to see people start wearing those little metal cup devices (like tiemeupalso's profile pic) backwards with the cage toward the body and still complain that it was too big.
Hi Josie, using the same method, what would you estimate the insertable length of the nano is? Thanks, Twitchy
It's another 10mm... so 45-50mm would be my guess. There's a thread on here, and a bunch of people own them, you could probably ask someone who owns one, and get an actual measurement
I'm not convinced the pullout problem is solved with this. But I like the idea of taking away whatever is left of these tiny-dick boys so their is really nothing to pull out. So, I'll be interested to see what the actual experience of these horny boys is with this device. It does look good, to totally put away what seems to be a problem with so many of these boys, taking it away, no more play, just learn to serve.
No... no device would ever really "shrink" your penis. If it does shrink, it's only temporary, and that's probably because the muscles haven't been used in so long that they're just kind of "weak"? But with a day or week of having a device off (depending on how long you had it on for), things should go back to a normal size... this is at least what I've observed.