Is the state of the art good enough for the society to make an acceptable virtual keyholder? Would it work for at least a fraction of the population interested but who do not have real people to serve in that role? I don't see a problem. The virtual entity could control a local key safe. But so far -- so far as I know -- nothing like this is out there. Maybe tomorrow?
Well sure, the tech is there, but I don't think the legal system is. Gemini.google.com refuses to do it. It says it creates power I'm alances and since it relies on digital connections, is vulnerable to communication loss and hacking. Gemini also doesn't have any built in scheduling capability. But you could probably program something like that. How do you see it working? Having it interact with a keypod?
Near feature: Me to a key safe: — Please, open! I haven't cum for two monthes! I desperately need to cum! Please, I beg you! A key safe: — No way! You was a bad boy! Lick my lock instead! How happy I am for having the real wife-keykolder!
Considering how many women in the world are single and would like a relationship, it seems just a bit lazy that guys would rather commit to a computer than to a woman. Look, women are a lot of work. They really are. They're hard to please. They expect us to treat them with respect. Unbelievable. But that's part of the point of a relationship: It's work. It's investment, over time. It takes effort. And care. The AI thing is silly. Put the effort into pleasing a woman, instead.
Ok, lemme give my point of view on this matter... First, I wouldn't go into remote keyholding, as I would feel more safe with an in-person keyholder at all times. But even so, I would NEVER trust a machine to take the place of a real person for something so important to me. Because unlike people, machines don't care. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying don't do it, I'm saying why I wouldn't do it and I highly recommend anyone take it into consideration before making such a decision.